Small Concession
2 items
Contract Design Comparison of Three Small Concession Cases in Small Cities — Breakthrough Patterns for the Three Walls
This case study compares three small concession implementations in small cities of 30,000–100,000 population — Fukuchiyama, Tsuyama, and Miyawaka — by examining how each contract design broke through the profitability, funding, and know-how walls presented in the earlier structural analysis. Three patterns emerge: zero public-burden, subsidy-hybrid, and private-proposal, differentiated by contract term, rent, and risk allocation. Implications for other municipalities considering adoption are drawn.
Structural Analysis of Japan's Small Concession Three Walls — Revenue Structure Types and Breakthrough Patterns
MLIT's 2026 handbook 'The Case for Small Concessions' identifies three structural barriers: the image wall, the partner wall, and the commercialization wall. This analysis cross-references all 15 cases from the PMC April 2026 seminar to classify Japan's small concession revenue structures — zero-burden type, subsidy-hybrid type, FTK type, and LABV type — and clarifies which conditions align with which type.