Structural Contradictions of the Technical Intern Training Program — Between 'International Contribution' and Labor Shortages
Japan's Technical Intern Training Program transitions to the Training and Employment Program in 2027. Examining 30 years of institutional contradiction.
What Is Happening
As of the end of October 2024, the number of foreign workers in Japan surpassed 2.3 million—a record high. Of these, approximately 470,000 are technical interns, and about 270,000 are residents under the Specified Skilled Worker status created in 2019.
Created under the banner of 'international contribution' to transfer skills to developing nations. In practice, it supplied labor to industries facing worker shortages.
Immigration Act revision established 'Technical Intern Training' as an independent residence status. Labor laws applied, yet disappearances continued rising.
Organization for Technical Intern Training (OTIT) established. Supervising organizations placed under licensing. Training plans made subject to approval.
For the first time, Japan officially acknowledged accepting foreign workers as 'labor' in 12 shortage sectors. A dual-track structure emerged alongside TITP.
Abolishes TITP and restructures around 'securing and developing human resources.' Easing restrictions on employer transfers is the focal point.
Behind these figures lies a "dual structure" spanning over 30 years. The Technical Intern Training Program was established in 1993 with the stated purpose of "international contribution through skills transfer to developing countries." However, in reality, it has functioned as a labor supply pipeline to industries facing labor shortages, such as agriculture, construction, and food manufacturing. This gap between facade and reality—this is the original sin of the system and the starting point of all problems.
In June 2024, legislation was passed to abolish the Technical Intern Training Program and transition to a "Training and Employment Program," scheduled for implementation in 2027. The phrase "international contribution" has been removed from the stated purposes, with "securing human resources and human resource development" brought to the fore. A 30-year belated correction of the facade. However, can structural problems be resolved merely by changing the wording of laws? To answer this question, we must delve into the internal structure of the system.
As of October 2024, foreign workers surpassed 2.3 million — a record high. While technical interns number ~470,000, specified skilled workers are surging (~270,000), shifting the system's center of gravity.
Background and Context
Sending Organizations: The "Invisible Exploitation Structure"
The most serious problem of the Technical Intern Training Program occurs before arrival in Japan. In sending countries such as Vietnam, Myanmar, and Cambodia, sending organizations collect high fees from trainees. The average amount is 540,000 yen, with cases exceeding 650,000 yen not uncommon in Vietnam.
Most trainees are young people from rural areas. To pay the fees, they accumulate debt, commonly arriving in Japan with debts of around 1 million yen. This "debt structure" makes it difficult to escape from poor working conditions. If they flee, only the debt remains. If they endure, they might be able to repay it after three years—this calculation functions as a dynamic that subordinates trainees to employers.
The 2023 final report of the expert panel on the Technical Intern Training Program proposed strengthening bilateral agreements to ensure appropriate fees from sending organizations. However, for sending countries, sending organizations are a means of earning foreign currency, and there is little incentive for stricter regulation. The system's distortions are embedded within cross-border supply chains.
Job Transfer Restrictions and the Chain of Disappearances
Another structural problem of the Technical Intern Training Program is "job transfer restrictions"—a system where changing training locations is generally not permitted. Even when there is harassment from employers, unpaid wages, or long working hours, trainees cannot leave their workplace of their own volition.
This restriction generates "disappearances." In 2023, the number of missing technical interns was 9,753. The cumulative number of missing persons since the program's inception has exceeded 100,000. Missing persons become illegal residents, pushed into even more vulnerable positions.
Under the Training and Employment Program, adjustments are underway to allow "job transfers at the individual's discretion" 1-2 years after starting work. However, remaining issues include the risk of job transfers concentrating in urban areas and accelerating rural labor shortages, concerns about "migrant worker" patterns of repeated job changes, and the problem of companies recovering their training investments. The balance between freedom of job transfer and talent retention can be said to be the greatest challenge in system design.
Population Decline and the Irreversibility of Foreign Worker Dependence
Japan's births in 2024 numbered approximately 686,000. The working-age population decreases by approximately 600,000 each year. In agriculture, nursing care, construction, and food manufacturing, many workplaces can no longer continue operations without foreign workers.
The acceptance ceiling for the Specified Skilled Worker system was set at 820,000 people over five years from 2024-2028 in a Cabinet decision in 2024. This represents more than double the previous 345,000. The shift from "international contribution" to "securing human resources" is no longer a correction of facade but an acknowledgment of social structural transformation.
Reading the Structure
What the 30 years of the Technical Intern Training Program has revealed is the process by which Japanese society became a de facto immigration-receiving country while avoiding the word "immigration."
First structure—"Institutional distrust caused by the gap between facade and reality." The double standard of proclaiming international contribution while utilizing people as labor force has structurally weakened the protection of trainees' rights. The positioning as "trainees" rather than "workers" has made the application of labor law ambiguous and justified inadequate supervision systems. While the Training and Employment Program's change of purpose to "securing human resources" is a first step in bridging this gap, merely changing the system's name will not alter the exploitation structure of sending organizations or the power balance at receiving sites.
Second structure—"International supply chain of intermediary exploitation." Information asymmetry and fee opacity occur at each stage of the three-tier structure: sending organizations, supervising organizations, and receiving companies. This structure is not unique to the Technical Intern Training Program but represents the Japanese version of the "recruitment fee problem" common to international labor mobility. Implementation of the "employer pays principle" advocated by the ILO—that employers should bear the costs of recruitment—is being questioned.
Third structure—"Irreversible dependence in a declining population society." Dependence on foreign workers is no longer temporary supplementation. In a society where 600,000 working-age people disappear annually, foreign workers are an indispensable component of the industrial base. However, to remain a country of choice, the quality of wages, working conditions, and social integration will be questioned. Comparative examination with the system designs of competing receiving countries, such as South Korea's Employment Permit System and Germany's Skilled Immigration Act, becomes essential.
The name of the system will change. But structures will be reproduced unless intentionally redesigned. With one year remaining until the implementation of the Training and Employment Program, the precision of its design will determine the next 30 years of Japan's foreign worker policy.
- Structural Transformation in the Era of 21 Million Non-Regular Workers — Has "Equal Pay for Equal Work" Narrowed the Gap?
- EBPM Evaluation Guide for Vocational Training — Practical Methods for Impact Measurement
References
「外国人雇用状況」の届出状況まとめ（令和6年10月末時点）
厚生労働省. 厚生労働省
Read source
技能実習制度及び特定技能制度の在り方に関する有識者会議 最終報告書
出入国在留管理庁. 法務省
Read source
ILO General Principles and Operational Guidelines for Fair Recruitment
International Labour Organization. ILO
Read source
外国人技能実習生の実習実施者に対する監督指導、送検等の状況
厚生労働省. 厚生労働省
Read source
