Social Design Lab
Systematically mapping the intellectual foundations of social design across six academic disciplines and clarifying its distinctiveness as a methodology
Background
The 'social design' that runs through ISVD's activities is situated at the intersection of three practices: structural social analysis (identifying invisible problems), epistemological critique (asking why they remain invisible), and design practice (translating insights into concrete interventions). This lab systematically organizes the six academic traditions underlying social design — social policy, agnotology, epistemology, participatory design, EBPM, and civil society theory — drawing on 977 citations found across more than 104 existing ISVD articles, and clarifies the differences from existing design research (service design, transition design, etc.).
Research Artifacts
Progress map of frameworks and deliverables for each phase. Click a slot to expand related notes.
Foundations
0/4Framework
Conceptual Framework
Literature Map
Deliverable
Key Concepts
Foundation Notes
Critique
0/3Framework
Critique Framework
Deliverable
Case Analysis
Critique Notes
Synthesis
0/3Framework
Synthesis Framework
Deliverable
Theory Notes
Counter-Design Proposal
Publication
0/3Framework
Publication Outline
Deliverable
Academic Paper
Public Report
Discourse
0/3Discourse Article
Lecture Materials
Educational Tools
Other Notes (27)
Citation Network Analysis — The Intellectual Map Drawn by 938 References
The Intellectual Coordinates of Social Design — Six Academic Roots Decoded
Literature Map: From Agnotology to 'Structural Invisibility'
Literature Map: The Genealogy of Civil Society Theory — Tocqueville→Habermas→Putnam→Salamon→Japan's NPO Movement and ISVD's Theory of Citizens
Literature Map: Social Design vs Service Design vs Transition Design
Literature Map: The Genealogy of EBPM — Evidence-Based Policy Making and ISVD's Data-Driven Approach
Literature Map: The Lineage of Participatory Design — Arnstein → Sanders → Manzini → ISVD's Methodology
Literature Map: Positioning Among Prior Institutions — Graduate School of Social Design, Rikkyo University, and ISVD
Literature Map: The Lineage of Social Policy — Tachibana, Kenjoh, Miyamoto, and ISVD's Intersection
The Genealogy and Critique of Design Justice
The Lineage of Deliberative Democracy
Institutional Design Theory and the Commons
Operationalizing the Six-Field Integration Model — A Four-Stage Mapping from Theory to Practice
Twenty Years of Kamiyama, Tokushima — Reading Rural Social Innovation through the Six-Field Integration Model
Sixteen Years of MindLab Denmark — Reading a Government Policy Innovation Lab through the Six-Field Integration Model
Comparison of Similar Labs / Research Institutions Abroad — Profiles of 7 Institutions and ISVD's Position
Literature Map: The Genealogy of Social Design Evaluation — 14 Years of English-Language Scholarship and the Gap in Japanese
The intersection of shrinking society and epistemic justice / Extracting structural patterns via 5-lab integration
The Limits and Self-Referentiality of Agnotology — Is ISVD Itself Producing 'Invisibilities'?
The Open Access Paradox — How to Reach Those Who Cannot Be Reached
What Social Design Is Not — Five Boundary Lines
The Limits of Nudge and Behavioral Design
The Boundary Between Speculative Design and Social Vision Design
Six-Field Integration Model — How Social Policy, Agnotology, Epistemology, Participatory Design, EBPM, and Civil Society Theory Intersect
Methodology Note: Why Data-Driven Visualization Constitutes an Intervention Against Epistemic Injustice
Methodology Note: 'Reading the Structure' — The Theoretical Foundations of ISVD's Three-Section Frame
Social Design Manifesto — Democratizing Vision So Everyone Can Shape the Future
Participate in & Support Research
If you're interested in ISVD's research, we welcome your support as a supporting member.
Other ISVD Labs
Separate research projects. Click to navigate to a different study.
Interested in this research?
We welcome researchers and practitioners to participate. You can contribute through joint research, data provision, fieldwork, and more.
Discuss research participationResearch Artifacts
- 1.1Conceptual Framework
- 1.2Literature Map
- 1.3Key Concepts
- 1.4Foundation Notes
- 2.1Critique Framework
- 2.2Case Analysis
- 2.3Critique Notes
- 3.1Synthesis Framework
- 3.2Theory Notes
- 3.3Counter-Design Proposal
- 4.1Publication Outline
- 4.2Academic Paper
- 4.3Public Report
- 5.1Discourse Article
- 5.2Lecture Materials
- 5.3Educational Tools