Skip to main content
Institute for Social Vision Design
ISVD-LAB-002Active

Agnotology Lab — Structural Analysis of Informational Injustice and Counter-Design

Research dissecting the mechanisms by which advertising, propaganda, media, education, religion, and authority structurally produce and maintain ignorance, reexamining social issues through the lens of agnotology.

Research Domain

Education

Research Lead

Naoya Yokota

Start Date

Mar 12, 2026

Background

Why do we remain ignorant — and is it by accident or by design? Through the lens of agnotology, we dissect the mechanisms by which advertising, propaganda, media, education, religion, and authority produce and maintain ignorance, reexamining social issues and current affairs from an academic perspective.

Foundations(18)0/4
Critique(8)0/3
Synthesis(1)0/3
Publication0/3
Discourse0/3

Research Artifacts

Progress map of frameworks and deliverables for each phase. Click a slot to expand related notes.

Foundations

0/4

Framework

Conceptual Framework

diagramRequired

Literature Map

listRequired

Deliverable

Key Concepts

mdx[]Required

Critique

0/3

Framework

Critique Framework

diagramRequired

Deliverable

Case Analysis

mdx[]Required

Critique Notes

mdx[]

Synthesis

0/3

Framework

Synthesis Framework

diagramRequired

Deliverable

Theory Notes

mdx[]Required

Counter-Design Proposal

mdx

Publication

0/3

Framework

Publication Outline

documentRequired

Deliverable

Academic Paper

mdxRequired

Public Report

mdx

Discourse

0/3

Discourse Article

mdx

Lecture Materials

slides

Educational Tools

tool

Methodology

Research methodology and approaches adopted in this lab.

Critical Literature Review

Systematically reviewing prior work in agnotology, epistemology, media studies and education, then extracting and classifying the mechanisms by which ignorance is deliberately produced, along several coding axes.

Tools & Methods
ZoteroZenodoJ-STAGEGoogle Scholar

Conceptual Analysis

Philosophically analysing the conceptual boundaries between ignorance, non-knowledge and the unknowable, and clarifying qualitative differences in ignorance across cases.

Tools & Methods
Concept mappingComparative analysis framework

Glossary

Key terms and definitions used in this research.

Agnotology
The study of how ignorance is deliberately produced and maintained. Proposed by R. N. Proctor in 2008.
Related terms:Strategic IgnoranceEpistemic Injustice
Source
Brandolini's Law
The rule of thumb that refuting misinformation takes an order of magnitude more energy than producing it. Also called the bullshit asymmetry principle.
Related terms:Post-TruthFirehose of Falsehood
Design Science Research (DSR)
A problem-solving research methodology that accumulates knowledge by designing and evaluating artifacts such as frameworks, taxonomies and models. Formalised by Hevner (2007).
Related terms:Agnotology
Source
Epistemic Injustice
A wrong in which a speaker's testimony is unfairly discounted because of their social attributes (gender, race, occupation and so on). Systematised by M. Fricker in 2007.
Related terms:AgnotologyTestimonial Injustice
Source
Ethics Washing
Self-regulation that puts on the appearance of ethics and is used in place of accountability that actually bites. In the AI industry, framings such as responsible AI and human-centred AI serve this purpose.
Related terms:Regulatory CaptureStrategic Ignorance
Source

Bibliography

Detailed reference list for this research.

  • Big AI's Regulatory Capture: Mapping Industry Interference and Government Complicity

    Birhane, A., Angius, R., Agnew, W., Pandit, H. J., Mitra, B., Dobbe, R., & Talat, Z. (2026)

    An empirical study classifying regulatory capture in the AI industry into five categories and 27 mechanisms, analysing 249 cases across 100 articles. Uses the Design Science Research methodology. To be presented at FAccT'26 (25-28 June 2026, Montreal). The main reference for this lab's note synthesis-big-ai-regulatory-capture

  • How Silicon Valley Uses Big Tobacco, Pharma, and Oil Tactics to Block Regulation

    Tech Policy Press (2026)

    An analysis piece explaining the 27-mechanism study of Birhane et al. (2026) for the US policy community. Stresses the genealogical continuity between the regulatory-lobbying tactics of the tobacco, pharmaceutical and oil industries and those of the AI industry

  • 無知学への招待 — 〈知らないこと〉を問い直す (Invitation to Agnotology: Rethinking Not Knowing)

    鶴田想人, 塚原東吾(編著) (2025)

    The first systematic introduction in Japanese. Four parts: overview, key terms, agnotology in Japan, and forms of ignorance

  • 現代思想 2023年6月号 特集=無知学/アグノトロジーとは何か (Gendai Shisō, June 2023: What Is Agnotology?)

    隠岐さや香, 塚原東吾, 鶴田想人 ほか (2023)

    The first special issue to discuss agnotology from several angles in Japanese, with contributions from history of science, philosophy, law, anthropology and gender history

  • 認識的不正義 — 権力は知ることの倫理にどのようにかかわるのか (Japanese translation of Fricker 2007)

    Fricker, M.(佐藤邦政 監訳, 飯塚理恵 訳) (2023)

    The Japanese translation of Fricker (2007), Keiso Shobo

Academic Roadmap

Society memberships, paper submissions, and presentation plans.

PublicationIn Progress2026-06

Working Paper ISVD-WP-2026-001: An Inductive Research Framework for Agnotology

Zenodo

Zenodo DOI取得 → 引用可能な学術文献化。synthesis-big-ai-regulatory-capture (2026-05-20) を Chapter 4 として組み込み予定

Paper SubmissionPlanned2026-11

Poster presentation at the JSSTS Annual Meeting

JSSTS

“Mechanisms That Produce Structural Ignorance — An Inductive Case Analysis”

MembershipPlanned

Join the Japanese Society for Science and Technology Studies (JSSTS)

JSSTS

The home society shared by both labs. Full membership ¥8,000/year

Link

Other Notes (24)

0
Hypothesis

What Is Silence-Structuring? — The Architecture of Pluralistic Ignorance

1
Foundations

The Reproduction of Authority and Ignorance — The Structure of 'No Need to Know'

1
Foundations

Motivated Ignorance — The Cognitive Structure of 'Not Wanting to Know'

1
Foundations

The Production Mechanism of Taboos — Who Decides What 'Must Not Be Said'

1
Foundations

Literature Map of Agnotology in the Japanese-speaking World 2022–2026 — Tracing the Birth of a Discipline

1
Foundations

Japan's Structural Reproduction of Climate Skepticism (How Doubt Circulates)

1
Foundations

The Statistical Absence of Femicide (The Structure of Deaths That Cannot Be Counted)

1
Foundations

The Monthly Labour Statistics Scandal and the Reproduction of State Ignorance — When the Numbers 'Did Not Exist'

1
Foundations

Selective Description in Educational Curricula and the Filtering of Knowledge

1
Foundations

"I Have No Recollection" — The Institutionalization Mechanism of Political Memory Denial

1
Foundations

Information Literacy as Counter-Design: Curriculum Principles Centered on Epistemic Justice

1
Foundations

Counter-Design Practices in Japan — A Structural Analysis of Domestic Attempts to Implement Epistemic Justice

1
Foundations

A Methodology for International Comparison of Counter-Design — A Framework for Comparing Four Lineages that Implement Epistemic Justice

1
Foundations

The Archaeology of Silence — Five Methods for Excavating What Was Never Debated

1
Foundations

Cross-Axis Analysis of 22 Notes / Structural Patterns in Ignorance Production

2
Critique

The New Ignorance Produced by Algorithms — Filter Bubbles and Echo Chambers

2
Critique

Why Are the Voices of Persons with Disabilities Not Heard? — The Japanese Structure of Testimonial Injustice

2
Critique

'Kūki' and Sontaku — The Japanese Form of Pluralistic Ignorance

2
Critique

Why Unreported Issues Are Treated as 'Nonexistent' — Media Agenda-Setting and Invisibilization in Japan

2
Critique

Okinawa and Structural Ignorance — The Politics of Mainland Japan's 'Not Knowing'

2
Critique

Poverty and Epistemic Exclusion — The Structure of 'Being Unable Even to Know'

2
Critique

Why Predatory Business Endures — Structural Analysis of Converting Information Asymmetry into Profit

2
Critique

The Doubt Manufacturing Industry — The Sixty-Year War of Tobacco and Climate

3
Synthesis

From 'Merchants of Doubt' to 'Captors of Regulation' — Reading Big AI's Regulatory Capture through 27 Mechanisms

Participate in & Support Research

If you're interested in ISVD's research, we welcome your support as a supporting member.

Other ISVD Labs

Separate research projects. Click to navigate to a different study.

Interested in this research?

We welcome researchers and practitioners to participate. You can contribute through joint research, data provision, fieldwork, and more.

Discuss research participation